|
Categories
> Projects,
Contracts & Tenders Category:
Management
of Contracts & Contract Claims
|
Program Duration |
: |
5 Days |
|
Program Date |
: |
22-26
April, 2012 |
|
Program Location |
: |
Cairo, Egypt |
|
Program Fees |
: |
US$ 3200/Per Person |
Program Introduction:
While the object of
international contracting is to write and manage contracts so as to
minimize disputes, some disagreements are inevitable. These can arise
from failures by one of the parties, but also often arise from
misunderstandings as to obligations under the contract.
This session will look at how claims (and counter claims) arise; how
they can be reduced or avoided by good contracts management; how they
should be evaluated when received, or prepared when being delivered and
how to resolve disputes arising from such claims. It will also, and most
importantly, look at ways of avoiding disputed claims in the first
place.
Once a dispute starts, it can usually be solved most effectively by
negotiation between the parties. However, if this does not prove
effective, some sort of third party intervention is required.
Traditionally, this has tended to focus on either involving state courts
(litigation) or the equivalent private method of getting a third party
to make a decision (arbitration). However, there are now many more
techniques available in the international market, including expert
determination, mini-arbitration, pendulum arbitration, adjudication, and
other techniques whereby a third party decides the matter for the
parties. In addition, there are also mediation, conciliation, hybrid
solutions such as Arb/Med, where a third party facilitates the
settlement by the parties themselves, rather than imposing a decision.
Many of these techniques rely on looking at the parties’ interests,
rather than their strict legal rights.
All of these processes, and indeed, claims and counterclaims generally,
become more complicated when placed in an international context. This is
particularly the case where a foreign law and/or legal system is
involved, with which you may not be familiar, and which may include
rules which conflict with those of your own country.
The session will deal with commercial disputes arising from Contracts
written in the English language, but will use techniques which have wide
application to the resolution of disputes.
PROGRAM OBJECTIVES:
-
Provide an understanding
of how and why claims and counterclaims arise
-
Explain the differences
between claims and counterclaims
-
Identify common causes
of claims and disputes, and how to avoid them
-
Discuss how to develop
contracts management procedures to avoid disputes over claims and
counterclaims, while resisting unjustified claims
-
Enhance understanding of
basic negotiation techniques to be used when resolving disputes
-
Provide an understanding
of some of the main methods of dispute resolution involving third
parties
-
Develop an understanding
of Traditional and Alternative Dispute Resolution techniques,
including different ways of resolving disputes without recourse to
courts or arbitration
-
Provide strategies and
tactics for negotiating during disputes
-
Explain how to use
contract provisions to reduce the risk of claims and disputes
PROGRAM OUTLINES:
How
Claims and Counter Claims arise
Types of Claims and Counter claims
Presenting and Evaluating Claims and Counter claims
Dispute Resolution
-
What is a dispute?
-
Introduction to
dispute resolution methods and techniques
-
Stage
negotiation - setting up internal dispute resolution within the
contract
-
Measures of
success - win-win negotiation
-
Understanding what constitutes a “win” for you
-
What will
be a “win” for the other party?
-
Mirror
negotiation/red teams
-
Negotiating
“without prejudice”
-
Making offers
-
Compromise
-
Bargaining
-
Interest-based
negotiations
-
Moving away
from rights-based thinking
-
Making the
cake bigger - settling other issues
-
Non-financial
solutions
-
Long-term
business relationships
-
Conflict and its
resolution
-
Defusing
conflict
-
Personality
clashes and how to avoid them
-
Dealing with
disputes as they arise - not letting them fester
-
Traditional
dispute resolution
-
Differences
between alternative dispute resolution methods
-
Mediation
-
Med/Arb and
Arb/Med
-
Adjudication
-
Expert
determination
-
Early Neutral
Evaluation
-
Mini-Arbitration
-
Dispute Review
Boards
-
Pendulum
arbitration
-
Ethical concerns
-
Audit trails
-
Avoiding the
suspicion of unethical behavior
-
Problems with
settlements based on interests, not rights
-
Applying the
same anti-corruption systems to claims as to tendering
-
Avoidance is
better than resolution
-
Practical
application of techniques
-
Final questions
and wrap-up
WHO SHOULD ATTEND?
-
Contracts Analysis
-
Contract Engineers
-
Cost/planning
Engineers
-
Individuals
involved in tendering/contracting functions
-
Project Managers
-
Contract
Administrators
-
Contracting Unit
Supervisors
-
Claims Managers
and Business Audit Officers
-
Contract
Strategists
-
General Managers
involved in contract negotiation and disputes
-
Commercial
Managers
-
Legal Department
staff looking for new techniques and an international approach
-
Anyone involved in
the strategy and management of disputes
|